fennek
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 591
Location: London/Tartu
Posted: 03 Feb 2008 11:10 am Post subject: Myth about Ayesha marriage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MYTH ABOUT AYESHA MARRIAGE
You did arrive at the right conclusion that the Iranian, both Shi’ah and Sunni Imams of the 3rd and 4th century Higra, maliciously created the myth of Mohammad and Ayesha’s Nikah, despite the fact that Allah has imposed the following restrictions, with respect to the selection of the spouses, in order to facilitate a happy and harmonious married life:
They should have comparable views about the life in general, must have similar physical and mental attributes and be of the same age. [57:37]
· They must have come of age, reached physical and mental maturity to make their own decisions and must possess sufficient means of subsistence. [4:6]
· They must be of sound mind, have sufficient strength to brave the rigors of life and must be full of vitality to enjoy the bliss of married life. [6:152]
It is imperative here to check up with the Qur’an about Mohammad’s social behavior and the kinds of commandments given to him by his Nourisher.
· The verse 33:52 pronounces openly, ‘Mohammad your are forbidden to marry any other woman, besides the one’s, who are already in your Nikah!’
· As per Surah Al-Threem, Mohammad had two wives at the time of his appointment to the exalted position of the Messenger of Allah. Despite the clear-cut command of the last revelation about his matrimonial limitations, how could Mohammad do, whatever he had been reported to be accomplishing by the compulsive Iranian liars, 300 years after his death? It does not make any sense, as the Messengers of Allah strictly adhere to the revelations they receive. Mohammad could never deviate from the explicit instructions passed on to him pertaining to his marital life and he could never indulge in the nefarious activities you have mentioned on the basis of the purported ‘Islamic literature.’ It is nothing but sordid kind of mudslinging on his impeccable character.
· The verse 47:4, declares a complete ban on all kinds of slavery and Mohammad personally promulgated this proclamation of Allah, then how could he go against it and commit the despicable acts that you blame him for? This kind of character assassination is the height of spitefulness, which his Iranian enemies leveled against him, because they are not a part of the Muslim Ummah, but are the worshippers of Mazdak.
· The verses 33:50-52 clearly show that at the time of receiving the high office of Allah’s Messenger, he had only two wives. He was also forbidden from taking new wives or divorcing his existing ones; then how could he go out and marry women left and right? This evidence destroys the malicious slur you have concocted against him.
· In the verse 33:4-5, Allah forbids the adoption of other people’s sons or daughters. Mohammad could never have gone against that clear-cut directive and declared Zaid as his son. This is an unadulterated falsehood. It means the story built upon this incident did not materialize ever, as he never adopted any son. Zainab, the name of Zaid’s alleged wife does not appear anywhere in the Qur’an. In addition, according to the verse 33:55, Mohammad was the figurative father of his nation and could not marry any woman as per the direct command of Allah to maintain his exalted image within his nation. Therefore, the marriage of Zainab with him is nothing but a blatant lie of the worst kind. To find the truth about this fictitious event in detail, you should get hold of my book entitled, ‘The Qur'anic concept of Nikah vs. Religious prostitution.’
The Quran has an excellent continuation of discussions on all aspects of human life, without any abrupt changes of topics. The screwed up translations might give that impression. Not a single existing translation of the Qur’an has done justice to the last revelation of Allah. The simple and straightforward message of the Qur’an has been corrupted, though the text remains intact. In fact, the legendary repetitive style of Arabic vernacular has been utilized to make the subject matter easily comprehensible. In order to reach the real connotation of each word, term and expression, it is essential to follow the built-in procedure laid down in the Qur’an. All a person has to do is to check every word, used with respect to various contexts in different verses, to grasp its real significance applicable to each and every aya. Only this way, it is possible to completely understand the over and undertones of each phrase, expression presented in each Surah [chapter].
Consistent with the verses 23:5, 24:30, 70:29, 24:3, all Messengers of Allah, including Mohammad, were righteous, honorable and immaculate individuals, who guarded their unblemished characters in the fortress of Nikah. In view of this irrefutable evidence, it is ridiculous and preposterous to say that Mohammad along with all other Messengers of Allah were debauched and decadent lechers.
In the presence of the above mentioned basic tenets of the Qur'an for Nikah between a man and a woman, how could Mohammad possibly wed a girl, who is said to be 6, 9 or 15 years old, when he personally, was close to 50? This tantamount to open defiance of the revelation that he received, which he would never have even dared to think about. The piles of Ahadith and the accounts of Sunnah, pertaining to this subject, are nothing but a pack of lies, which the Iranian Imams, his most vindictive antagonists, fabricated to ridicule Mohammad the Arab and invalidate the constitution he implemented.
In addition, Ayesha and Khadijah, Zainab, and Fatma [non existing daughter of Mohammad] are non-Arabic names and there is no truth in the myth that Mohammad ever married non-Arab women. The fact of the matter is, these names have Iranian origin and the Ahadith manufacturers of these stories forgot this aspect, while instituting these names in their falsehoods.
BEST REGARDS
Akhtar sherazi
http://quraniceducationandresearch.com/Q&A/Ayesha.htm_________________
17:36
Back to top
Nektub
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 312
Location: Dublin
Posted: 05 Feb 2008 10:06 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mulle tundub, et ajaloolased on midagi vassinud Aysha vanuse koha pealt,ma kuidagi ei suuda uskuda, et Prohvet Muhamed vois vaadata nii noore tudruku poole.Uks Muhamedi autobiograafiline raamat vaidab Aysha vanuse kohta mitu erinevat varianti,nii et kuidas me seda voimegi teada?
_________________
"Ma olen alistanud end Maailmade Isandale"(2:131)
Back to top
fennek
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 591
Location: London/Tartu
Posted: 06 Feb 2008 01:32 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
poora tahelepanu sellele tsitaadile tekstis:
Quote:
In addition, Ayesha and Khadijah, Zainab, and Fatma [non existing daughter of Mohammad] are non-Arabic names and there is no truth in the myth that Mohammad ever married non-Arab women. The fact of the matter is, these names have Iranian origin and the Ahadith manufacturers of these stories forgot this aspect, while instituting these names in their falsehoods.
_________________
17:36
Back to top
tarmo
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 96
Posted: 06 Feb 2008 01:45 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a tegelt ei ole prohveti eraelu väga meie asi, talle antud sõnum on ju oluline...
selle uurimisega tegelemine on minu arust sama suur mõtetus nagu Kroonika lugemine
peace
Back to top
fennek
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 591
Location: London/Tartu
Posted: 06 Feb 2008 06:24 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
oige ta on. ega vaga ei huvitagi - Koraanis pole sellest suurt midagi mainitud ja kui on, siis vaga yldiselt. point on lihtsalt selles, et see nn ayesha vanuse kysimus on pinnuks silmas neile, kes islamit maha teha yritavad. lihstalt veike jutuke neile lugemiseks, muud ei midagi. lihtsalt jarjekordseks toendiks, kui palju jura ja valesid on toe pahe serveeritud..
_________________
17:36
Back to top
Nektub
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 312
Location: Dublin
Posted: 06 Feb 2008 08:58 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uks arvamus, mida kuulsin selle kohta on see, et tol ajal olid inimesed rohkem vastutus tundlikumad, 9-aastane tudruk oli valmis peret looma.Et ikka naidata Prohvetit paremas valguses.Tegelikult lihtsat vassitakse,Prohvetil polnud hada midagi.Aga minu jaoks on uudis, et need tuntud naiste nimed polegi araabi nimed.
_________________
"Ma olen alistanud end Maailmade Isandale"(2:131)
Back to top
fennek
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 591
Location: London/Tartu
Posted: 06 Feb 2008 10:41 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ma arvan, et need jutud on lihtsalt mingite pedofiilide valjamoeldised. kuulujutud voib-olla. oletused kindla peale.
_________________
17:36
Back to top
Nektub
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 312
Location: Dublin
Posted: 13 May 2008 10:02 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leidub ka selliseid ajaloo andmeid:
Ibn Hisham’s recension of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rashul Allah, the earliest surviving biography of Muhammad, records Aisha as having converted to Islam before Umar ibn al-Khattab, during the first few years of Islam around 610 CE. In order to accept Islam she must have been walking and talking, hence at least three years of age, which would make her at least fifteen in 622 CE.
Tabari also reports that Abu Bakr’s four children were all born during the Jahiliyyah, the pre Islamic period, which could be said to have ended in 610 CE, making Aisha at least twelve in 622 CE.
Pealeht 
Teis Aug 26, 2008 3:45 pm